Having survived this long in silence over this FFK-Kalu hullabaloo, the discussions I had with friends on my Facebook page made me give up my resolve to remain quiet. I have followed FFK's writings for months, and I have to repeat that I am yet to arrive at a better word for his writings than "ramblings". He swings from blind spiritual extremist views in calling Obama the antichrist who should not be voted for, to cultural extremism by over generalizing one man's comments into an ethnic and uncalled-for outburst. I also believe it is disrespectful for a former minister and presidential spokesperson to call the comments of a former governor "unintelligent rubbish", and I owe such a man no respect. While I agree that Orji Uzo Kalu went beyond bounds in labeling Lagos a "no man's land", and insulted the collective heritage of Lagosians, and by extension, the Yorubas, I still believe strongly that Fani Kayode's response was utterly irresponsible.
A country's greatness and strength lies in recognizing differences and working together to build them, but greater strength lies in respecting the sensitivities and ethno-religious fragility of your countrymen, and striving to respect individual and group differences in culture and religion. While some of us are advocating for a true federal system, where ethnic leanings will be held secondary and competence and integrity upheld as the main crux of leadership, Fani Kayode attempted to open old wounds with snide references to the pogrom and civil war, publicly condemning an entire Igbo race in a classic case of sheer fallacy of hasty generalization, and then attempting to grossly undermine the contribution of millions of Igbos to the socio-economic development of Lagos.
I believe Fani would have done excellently well if he had taken on Kalu on his words and blasted him in return, infact, he would have gotten sympathy from even some Igbo kinsmen. But defending Lagos by undermining the history of a major race? In a culturally sensitive polity?? How does that translate to being a responsible statesman and public figure??? Was Fani not singing Obasanjo's praises when he withheld the Lagos funds for two years?? If he loved Lagos that much, how come he was running his mouth so loudly against "perceived Obasanjo enemies in Lagos"??, and participated in a government that was committed to running Lagos aground?? Please Fani cannot succeed in deceiving people like us with his sheer hypocrisy and desperate quest for relevance. He was almost worse than Abati in his days as the presidential parrot. We have not forgotten so fast. It’s time we started ignoring people who had decades of opportunities to make a difference, did nothing but enjoy the spoils of government, and then attempt to further plunge us into crisis when they get booted out of government!
I think we should break this down into tiny basic bits of rhetorics, so as not to get lost in all the barrage of historical banters, let’s look at it this way; we can all agree Kalu went overboard with his comment, and deserved to be “educated”, but after then, what next? Is it not a major feature of mega-cities to downplay indigeneship and promote diversity even while preserving cultural heritage? Was this not why and how Hilary Clinton could become a Senator from New York despite having never lived there, and offered “New Yorkers” unprecedented legislative service? Didn’t she become a New Yorker herself?
Now, to Lagos and the contribution of Igbos, or say, others generally, Can the south west singularly maintain the diverse market opportunity Lagos provides to potential and forever courting investors? Could the south west have fed Lagos with the economic boom and mega status it enjoys all alone? How many cities in the world of Lagos’ status attained such with culturally parochial mindset? Is it New York? Bombay? Tokyo? Shangai? Seoul? Delhi? Mumbai? A first glance at those cities will show how much all of them have one thing in common; their openness to diversity and accommodating culture, where legitimate immigrants can come in, belong, and contribute to economic growth. We all know that the contributions of the Sage Obafemi Awolowo to south west development cannot be underplayed or matched by any other statesman (I stand to be corrected), but again, after then what? If the south westerners were such geniuses at single handedly feeding cities with mega population and turning them around to socio-economic hubs, then why has Ibadan, despite all Awo’s efforts, gone to sleep? Where is Abeokuta in the hierarchy of commerce? Then Akure, Ife, Ijebu, Oshogbo, Ilesha, Idanre, Akoko and many others? Why have they not all become another Lagos? Truth be told, NO MEGACITY ever REMAINS solely for indigenes, except it chooses to sacrifice such status, not even Kano’s economy was developed solely by Northerners, how much more almighty Lagos. So Fani’s claim that “…The Igbo had little to do with the extraordinary development of Lagos between 1880 right up until today. That is a fact. Other than Ajegunle, Computer Town, Alaba and buying up numerous market stalls in Isale Eko, where is their input?..” is totally baseless and is borne out of either sheer prejudice, intentional hate, or outright ignorance, which puts to question his so called “sound Cambridge historian” intellect. He even goes ahead to insult our intelligence by calling it a fact!
Have we also considered that a Wole Soyinka, Tunde Fashola, Bola Tinubu, Femi Okunnu, and many others with more direct stake, if they responded to Kalu, would have done so with deeper maturity? (Based on antecedents, your choice to disagree), if you agree, would this not be because they are probably more socially responsible? Would FFK have also said these exact things if he was still in government or position of responsibility? In plain terms, Fani-Kayode’s ramblings are purely hypocritical and irresponsible!
Having said that, I believe the true Lagos Igbos know and appreciate the fact that Lagos is NOT a “no-man’s” land, that is why there is an Eze-Ndigbo, who pays homage to the Oba of Lagos, that is why there are white cap chiefs, and traditional Lagos families like Kosoko, Dosunmu, Oniru, Etti, Olumegbon, etcetera. But then, I think the Igbos also have the right to ask for a sense of belongingness in a city where they are an integral part of socio-economic activity. For God’s sake, even Lebanese and Chinese lay claim to being “Lagosians”! Does that also mean they want to reclaim Lagos from the Oba?? Absolutely No! But that is the beauty of a city like Lagos, diversity and openness.
So therefore, our focus should be on educating the Orji Kalus of this world, putting them in their rightful place on the mat (where other respected statesmen sit on high tables), and shutting them up with more civil write-ups! Not ego-filled and boastful claims of intellectual astuteness like Fani-Kayode, when his so called writings lack depth and defies basic understanding of economics and sociology, talk less of history, and attempt to further fan the embers of ethnic hate by opening old wounds and insulting an entire race.
Long Live Lagos. And long live Nigeria.
Tuesday, August 27, 2013
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
My Personal Ode to HUGO CHAVEZ: A Lesson for Africa, A Shame to "American Consensus"!
In as much as I am an ardent believer in Modern liberalism, representative democracy, and free market economy with not-more-than-neccessary government intervention as the best forms of social, political and economic ideologies. I cannot however deny my admiration for Hugo Chavez and his socialist policies.
The lifes and times of Hugo Chavez should be a great lesson to many other leaders in the world, especially Africa, where the priority of myopic leaders is to enrich their pockets, impoverish their people, create illiteracy, hunger, and sacrifice their countries' future on the alter of pro-Americanism.
From Mugabe, to Mobutu, Idi Amin, Sanni Abacha, Gnassingbe Eyadema, Robert Mugabe, Modibo Keita, Olusegun Obasanjo, Ahmed Sekou Toure, Ibrahim Babangida, Omar Bongo, the list of African tyrants goes on and on and on. Individuals unworthy of leading small groups have assumed national leaderships in Africa, and contributed to the abject impoverishment of their nations, turning the blessings of Africa's resources into her curses. These shameless rulers who spend all their time in power stealing unprintable amounts of wealth are always so quick to please western powers, until ofcourse they fall out of favour, and alas become toppled, murdered, or disgraced out of office through pressures from various quarters or the bullet.
Once upon a time when leaders like Hugo Chavez rise from small sized nations and leave their footprints on the hearts of mankind, friends and foes alike, we owe it to posterity to salute such men and document their achievements. Chavez displayed unprecedented courage in his anti western ideas, and proved to the world that nations can bring their citizens out of poverty without neccessarily acting as western "ass-kissers". Chavez questioned status quo in a largely uni-polar world order, and proved that the "American consensus" approach to socio-economic policy wasn't always the best or only option to follow.
Despite an overwhelming influence on the people and the polity, Chavez conducted and won elections, introduced constitutional reforms and subjected them to referendum, and above all, he accepted the results of these processes.
While he is not a perfect leader, as no one is, we can safely agree that Chavez was able to shut the mouths of his most powerful western adversaries by delivering quality, measurable leadership to his ordinary citizens.
To make it simple, Hugo Rafeal Chavez bettered the life of his citizens, especially the poor.
Below are a summary of some of the achievements of this tremendously remarkable man.
1. REDUCTION OF POVERTY
During the administration of the Bolivarian Government led by President Hugo Chávez, the extreme poverty rate significantly fell from 42% in 1998 to 9.5%. This result allowed Venezuela to achieve in advance this UN Millennium Goal. General poverty was also significantly reduced, from 50.5% in 1998 to 33.4% in 2008.
Venezuela's Human Development Index also increased from a 0.69 (medium development) in 1998 to 0.84 (high development) in 2008. Currently, Venezuela ranks 67 out of 179 countries according to the 2008 UNDP report.
Venezuela's Gini coefficient fell to 0.4099, the lowest in the country's history and in Latin America. In 1998 it was 0.4865.
2. ACCESS TO EDUCATION
In 2005, Venezuela achieved the goal set by UNESCO to declare a country an illiteracy-free territory; 96% of adults and elders know how to read and write. But we are still working and 99.6% of the population over the age of 15 is now literate.
Currently, the Venezuelan state spends 7% of the GDP on education, compared to 3.9% of Venezuela's GDP in 1998. Without including the socialist missions (social programs), school enrolment was 6.2 million students in 1998; now it is 7.5 million students both in public and private schools.
The socialist missions, created as an initiative of President Chávez to look after the population excluded from the formal educative system, show the following statistics:
a. Mission Robinson II: 437,171 students, including 81,000 indigenous students, have graduated.
b. Mission Ribas: 510,585 students have graduated.
c. Mission Sucre: 571,917 Venezuelans are in the higher education system in 24 programs (career), in 334 different municipalities. 30,000 students have graduated from seven programs: education, environmental management, social management of local development, journalism, management, computer science, and agro-food production.
3. ACCESS TO HEALTH
Venezuela invests 4.2% of its GDP in health and it continues deepening strategies to guarantee Venezuelans free access to health with the creation of the social programs Barrio Adentro I-II-III and IV. Up to 2009, Barrio Adentro has made the following achievements:
a. 24,884,567 Venezuelans, that is to say 88.9% of the population, benefit from this mission.
b. 630,491 Venezuelan lives have been saved thanks to this mission.
c. Barrio Adentro has inaugurated: 6,531 popular health centers, 479 Integral Diagnosis Centers, 543 Integral Rehabilitation Centers, 26 High Technology Centers, 13 popular clinics, 459 popular opticians and 3019 locations offering medical and dental care.
The public health policies developed by the Bolivarian Government have managed to reduce the children mortality rate (children under 5 years) to 13.7%. In 1990 this figure was 25.8%.
4. SOCIAL SECURITY
Unemployment has been reduced by 50% during President Chávez’s administration, falling from 12% to 6.1% by early 2009.
In May 2007, the Venezuelan minimum wage became the highest in Latin America (US$372). In addition, workers receive a monthly bonus for food amounting to over US$139. Also, pensions have been increased to the minimum wage.
5. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
The Venezuelan economy has experienced 20 consecutive quarters of growth. The year 2004 stands out with an historical growth of 18.3%. The 2008 rate of growth was 4.9%. Our economy has grown by 526.98% compared to the Venezuelan economy in 1998.
Venezuela has the fourth largest economy in Latin America after Brazil, Mexico and Argentina.
6. FOOD SOVEREIGNTY
In order to guarantee the country's food security and sovereignty, the Bolivarian Government created Mission Food, whose aim is to offer basic foodstuffs to the Venezuelan population at low prices and without intermediaries. This initiative materialized with the creation of a network of storing centers and stores (Mercal, PDVAL, ASA, FUNDAPROAL, and silos, among others).
In 1998, Venezuela produced 16,272,000 tons of vegetables. By 2008, Venezuela managed to produce 20,174,000 tons of food. This represents a 24% increase.
7. PUBLIC DEBT
The public debt dropped from 73.5% of the GDP in 1998 to 14.4% in 2008, placing the national deficit as one of
the lowest in the World.
In 1998, a debt of $3 billion was paid off to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and to the World Bank (WB).
8. INTERNATIONAL RESERVES
By early 1999, the International Reserves amounted to US$14.3 billion. In January 2009, they amount to US$41.9 billion.
9. TECHNOLOGY SOVEREIGNTY
Before the Bolivarian government, there was practically no investment in science and technology. Today, 2.69% of Venezuela's GDP is aimed at science and technology.
information and communication technologies was boosted.
On October 29, 2008, Venezuela launched the Simón Bolívar Satellite from the Sichuan's Satellite Center in the People's Republic of China. It is operative and the Venezuelan state has taken control. Satellite services will be offered to thousands of communities all around Venezuela, and beyond our borders in other Latin American and Caribbean countries, with tele-education and telemedicine programs.
The consolidation of Venezuela's technological sovereignty also includes the nationalization of the main, strategic, telephone company, Venezuela's National Company of Telephones (CANTV, Spanish acronym).
10. ELIMINATION OF GENDER INEQUALITY
Gender equality adds to the achievements of the Venezuelan society. Women’s participation in Communal Centers is 60%; 4 out of the 5 Public Powers are headed by women. The women's presence in the National Assembly (Venezuelan parliament) increased from 10% to 16.5%.
(The 10 points enumerated here are Excerpts From the Venezuelan solidarity campaign)
A good study of Chavez's life will show the painful obvious fact that some of us will gladly sacrifice our leaders for a day to have the leadership styles of Hugo Chavez!
Rest in Peace the "Bolivarian" General!
(Ayo Bankole Akintujoye, Lagos Nigeria, March 2013)
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
EXCLUSIVE NEWS: Dangote Now World’s 43rd Richest Man
EXCLUSIVE NEWS: Dangote Now World’s 43rd Richest Man

With a net worth of $16.1bn as of March 2013, the President, Dangote Group, Alhaji Aliko Dangote, has moved up in the latest world richest ranking to number 43 from 76 in 2012.
According to the list which was released on Monday by Forbes, Dangote and the Chairman of Globalom, Dr. Mike Adenuga were the only Nigerians on the list.
Dangote, 55, however, retained his position as the richest man in Africa and the richest among manufacturers in the world with a net worth of $16.1bn.
Adenuga, 59, on the other hand, ranked 269 on the list with a net worth of $4.7bn.
The world billionaires, list presented Carlos Slim Helu, a Mexican as the world richest man with a net worth of $73bn, while Bill Gates of United States came second with a net worth of the $67bn.
Adenuga, 59, on the other hand, ranked 269 on the list with a net worth of $4.7bn.
The world billionaires, list presented Carlos Slim Helu, a Mexican as the world richest man with a net worth of $73bn, while Bill Gates of United States came second with a net worth of the $67bn.
Others are Armancio Ortega of Spain ($57bn); Warren Buffet, United States ($53.5bn); and Larry Ellison of US with $43bn net worth, coming third, fourth and fifth, respectively.
Forbes said, “To compile net worths, we value individuals’ assets, including stakes in public and private companies, real estate, yachts, art and cash – and account for debt.
“We attempt to vet these numbers with all billionaires. Some cooperate; others don’t. We also consult an array of outside experts in various fields.”
Forbes said, “To compile net worths, we value individuals’ assets, including stakes in public and private companies, real estate, yachts, art and cash – and account for debt.
“We attempt to vet these numbers with all billionaires. Some cooperate; others don’t. We also consult an array of outside experts in various fields.”
The past year has been eventful for Dangote. In October, he sold off a controlling stake in his flour milling company to Tiger Brands of South Africa and pocketed $190m in cash.
In February, his Dangote Sugar Refineries acquired a 95 per cent stake in Savannah Sugar in a bid to maintain its dominant position in the Nigerian sugar industry.
Dangote started building his fortune more than three decades ago when he began trading in commodities like cement, flour and sugar with a loan he received from his maternal uncle.
He delved into full production of these items in the early 2000s and went on to build the Dangote Group, West Africa’s largest publicly-listed conglomerate, which now owns sugar refineries, salt processing facilities and Dangote Cement.
Source: Punch Nigeria
In February, his Dangote Sugar Refineries acquired a 95 per cent stake in Savannah Sugar in a bid to maintain its dominant position in the Nigerian sugar industry.
Dangote started building his fortune more than three decades ago when he began trading in commodities like cement, flour and sugar with a loan he received from his maternal uncle.
He delved into full production of these items in the early 2000s and went on to build the Dangote Group, West Africa’s largest publicly-listed conglomerate, which now owns sugar refineries, salt processing facilities and Dangote Cement.
Source: Punch Nigeria
Saturday, March 17, 2012
Friday, March 16, 2012
Student Unionism In Nigeria; The Past, The Present, and the Future
I made quite a number of adversaries in my university days because of my unwavering stand on student unionism in Nigeria and its consequent degradation. I always believed that the suspension of unionism in Nigerian institutions was justified and that a complete overall of unionist activities was inevitable.
Student unions had been hijacked by rascals and activism replaced with terrorism and cultism. In the days of civilized and vibrant unionism, student unions were known to effect major changes and influence government decisions through high level organized protests and demonstrations. In the hey days of the military and even years preceding it, Nigerian students and its leaders were an integral part of the pro-democracy struggle and were reputed to produce leaders of enviable intellect with a depth of national issues and strong diplomatic and negotiation skills with which they won most of the struggles with various authorities. Riots were usually the very last resorts and they were usually calculated and organized, with strategic agenda for the actualization of their demands. 




One of such riots that easily comes to mind was the “Ali must go” riot in 1978. As chronicled by Taminu Umar in his paper “The Derailment Of Student Unionism In Nigeria” ‘...During the uprising many student’s lives were lost while agitating for the ouster of the then education minister, colonel Ahmadu Ali ... The “Ali Must Go”, riots like many in those days, was a landmark achievement by student unionism in Nigeria: it has opened up the eyes of our leaders to the fact that students knew their rights and can fight oppression no matter the intimidation...’
Student leaders were almost incorruptible and impenetrable! Those were the days when the fear of NANS was the beginning of wisdom for dictators and totalitarian rulers!
However, like every other spectrum of the Nigerian society, student unionism derailed…it came down so hard and so fast that there was a thin line, or no line at all, between terrorism, cultism, and unionism! In fact, renowned cultists became the determinants of who to become elected in union elections, and NANS congresses became characterized by clashes and cold-blooded murders.
The degradation not only applied to the make-up of the unions, it also had bearing on the modus operandi of “activism”. Intellectual activism died. And terrorist activism was born. Students began to engage in acts which brought to ridicule the whole essence of unionism and rubbished tertiary education as a whole. For example, a Vice-Chancellor of the University of Ibadan was “kidnapped” and locked up in the toilet of a male hostel for hours! In some other “alutas”, there were recorded cases were some Vice Chancellors were made to frog-jump for several kilometers! Student protests became synonymous with vandalism and thus contributed to the dearth in educational infrastructure, with little or no ideology and intellectual content in those protests; it was difficult, or almost impossible to articulate and communicate a clear set of actualize-able demands and thus, most protests only left behind tales of woes; deaths, vandalism, loss of academic calendar, etc and no real victory for the struggle.
At a brainstorming session with some selected youth leaders on the design of a strategic roadmap for educational advancement and youth empowerment, I accused the Ladoja government and politicians generally as being largely responsible for the derailment in education and student unionism. I also opined that the only way to reform and increase intellectualism among our students was to phase-out all unions and then build new ones with new attitude and enlightened leadership. The politicians were also to stop involving student unions in politics and buying out their future with bags of money. A large percentage of the derailment in the unions can be alluded to the student leaders’ exposure to government bribes and university authority buy-outs. This is responsible for sky-rocketing the desperation and violence at union elections.
This opinion still stands till today! A new union is inevitable, Nigerian students have no leadership as at today. NANS exists solely for the benefit of any government of the day, with former NANS president Kenneth Orkuma Hembe endorsing former President Obasanjo’s very unpopular third term agenda and even recently, NANS president Comrade Dauda Mohammed came out to support the removal of fuel subsidy!!! In his statement published in Leadership Newspapers of 19th January 2012, he said “…NANS appreciates the courage of President Goodluck Jonathan in removing the fraudulent fuel subsidy and agrees in totality with the federal government on the inevitability of the removal. We strongly believe that the subsidy removal is a bold step in fighting the corruption that has defied all known accounting principle in NNPC…” It reeks of a totally conscienceless, bought-out and aptly corrupt union that lacks the ability to organize, articulate and defend the interests of students and youths.
We need to, as a matter of urgency, build a union that can mobilize students for world-class struggles as witnessed by students in Europe, we need to give birth to a union that can organize sit-ins and occupy campuses without bloodshed, a union whose democratic processes can serve as a benchmark and model for other democratic institutions, a union that can lay a framework for a generational shift in the Nigerian battered value-system and a union that can earn the respect of both school and state authorities. That is the future I desire for student unionism in Nigeria. So help me God.
Saturday, January 8, 2011
The Blame Syndrome and Nigerian Socio-economic Development.
![]() |
Hope and actualization of Dreams are born out of a conscious determination... |
The basic nature of man is to act,& not be acted upon. To take responsibility,to be proactive,to choose! However,this is not the case in our society as individuals at several levels in our society choose to be acted upon & succumb to reactive,as against proactive behaviour, which unfortunately is the root of our socioeconomic backwardness.
It amuses me when I see youths,who belong to the most energetic age group fail to act & make things happen but rather choose to lay back & let things happen to them,& then push the BLAME on the nearest person or thing. It further fascinates me when I see that this Blame syndrome has eaten so deep into our fabric that it has become cultural,even spiritual!
Our children BLAME their parents/guardian for sending them to public schools, or making them hawk,& then use that as an excuse for not finding time to read or refusing to do so when told to,while some few proactive ones in the same shoes with them come out in flying colours,proceed to higher institutions & go on to become great men with inspiring stories.
Our students BLAME their lecturers for failing them in exams & bribery,or ASUU for going on strike,or lack of electricity,or lack of conducive environment or money; anything at all,as excuses for performing poorly in school. As if those who excelled all have rich parents,or attended classes somewhere else,or were taught by different lecturers,or had generators in their hostels!
Our GRADUATES blame the government for not providing jobs,their parents for not being influential,& even the companies for favoritism & nepotism. And they shy away from self-development,they refuse to acquire needed skills & competences, refuse to show initiative,to take interest & aptitude tests,to study industry,expand knowledge,sharpen their thinking, & even get acquainted with the business process & problems of organizations they are interested in...the worst of which is,we can't even justify our degrees!!! We render ourselves useless to ourselves, employers & our society,& are quick to sacrifice others for our unemployability.
The employed blame their bosses for lack of results & non-performance,blame colleagues for conspiracy & corruption,& quickly justifies Mr. X's promotion to be a result of his relationship with the MD.
The dismissed blame their extended family for spiritual curses,or friends for jealousy,some even their mothers for witchcraft!..and run to religious houses,some of whom tell the truth,but most of whom leverage on our cultural psyco-pathology to rip citizens off & feed fat & play to the gallery with baseless theories of spiritual interference!
Companies with bad & greedy management blame government & multiple taxation for their unprofitable state,they blame lack of social amenities,high overhead costs,too many employees,debtors etc etc for their misfortunes while their competitors soar & expand by the day.
Our government blame the nation's woes on previous bad leadership,an irony as the past leaders are still part of present governments. Past civilian governments blamed the military,the military blamed the founding fathers,& those in turn blame the colonial masters!
Our society keeps moving round & round in a web of blames & counter-blames...& no one is taking responsibility & initiative for their actions & destiny...the few who do are victimized or accused of being beneficiaries of nepotism. I weep for my country,my heart bleeds for my generation!
This is not to say that all these factors mentioned above do not exist,or do not constitute a serious challenge to socio-personal & economic development. However, as Eleanor Roosevelt observed,"No one can hurt you without your consent"...& in the words of Ghandi,"They cannot take away our self respect if we do not give it to them"
And until we can truly accept,as Steven Covey states that "I am what I am today because of the choices I made yesterday..." Then we can't say 'I will be tomorrow what & where I choose to be!'
And if we can't say this,that is,take up what we psychologists call internal locus of control,& expunge these external loci of control,then our youths,& our society will keep falling victim to self-inflicted under-achievement & impoverishment...
So help us God...
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Re: Let's Legalize Drugs!!!
This is coming as my reaction to the recent calls by certain quaters in the international community for the legalizing of drugs. One of such is the statement by former Mexican President Vicente Fox in support of ''legalizing production, sales and distribution'' of drugs which made big headlines around the world.Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/08/12/1772336/has-the-time-come-to-legalize.html#ixzz0x32XvpRD
This was also written as a response to my friend Niyi Adeyemi's note: "Let's Legalize Drugs"..Read more: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=433234763576
But one issue that keeps nagging at my mind is if we are not unconsciously measuring & generalizing drug damage to that done by cigarettes and marijuana and alcohol.Take it or leave it...the damage done by these drugs to its consumers is child's play when juxtaposed with that done by Cocaine, heroine & harder drugs.
While agreeing to the concept of the freedom of the adult to choose, and also the concept of relative morality based on the Principle of individual differences as highlighted in various arguments, we must also not forget that the state was created to protect the collective security of its citizens, either from self or others.
No responsible govt will allow substances that are known to wreck tremendous havoc on its consumers to be a free-for-all. We have seen a Micheal Jackson weep for Whitney Houston when she broke down on stage...a direct impact of hard drugs, we have seen the ruin to Brenda Fassi and, many many more others. Hard drugs is no child's play bro, and I think it will be ridiculous for us to attempt to under-estimate its negative impact on people. In-fact, it is laughable to compare crack with cigarettes...or alcohol...or even Marijuana for that matter!!!
While the war against drugs has come with its own drawbacks, we must also not be so quick to rush into calling for legalizing these substances. We have to approach this issue from a holistic perspective. It is a plain fact that the illegality of drugs has contributed to a considerable reduction in its consumption. The records are there for anyone familiar with statistical data in psychology.
It is a very plausible argument to push for legalizing marijuana & less harder substances, at least for small amounts & personal use. This is because as we have all seen, the consequences of the attempt at prohibiting these drugs is not worth the damage done by the substance.
But to use this as a basis for pushing for selling cocaine & other cracks off the shelve? That might be biting more than we can chew...even a closer look at the statement by former Mexican President Vicente Fox in the link posted above dwelled more on marijuana & the likes. He was a little conservative on calling out-rightly for the legalizing of cocaine!!! I'm sure any right thinking government will know better!!!
Finally, we have been talking about revenue and all, it is true that from a revenue perspective, countries can do a lot of good to their economy with these drug-generated billions, but please, spare Africa more revenue problems. The problem oil has caused to us, thanks to our leadership, has not been resolved. How much more legalizing drug-peddling and fueling corruption-infested leaders' ego to siphon more billions from drug racketeering...that's a recipe for disaster!!!
This was also written as a response to my friend Niyi Adeyemi's note: "Let's Legalize Drugs"..Read more: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=433234763576
But one issue that keeps nagging at my mind is if we are not unconsciously measuring & generalizing drug damage to that done by cigarettes and marijuana and alcohol.Take it or leave it...the damage done by these drugs to its consumers is child's play when juxtaposed with that done by Cocaine, heroine & harder drugs.
While agreeing to the concept of the freedom of the adult to choose, and also the concept of relative morality based on the Principle of individual differences as highlighted in various arguments, we must also not forget that the state was created to protect the collective security of its citizens, either from self or others.
No responsible govt will allow substances that are known to wreck tremendous havoc on its consumers to be a free-for-all. We have seen a Micheal Jackson weep for Whitney Houston when she broke down on stage...a direct impact of hard drugs, we have seen the ruin to Brenda Fassi and, many many more others. Hard drugs is no child's play bro, and I think it will be ridiculous for us to attempt to under-estimate its negative impact on people. In-fact, it is laughable to compare crack with cigarettes...or alcohol...or even Marijuana for that matter!!!
While the war against drugs has come with its own drawbacks, we must also not be so quick to rush into calling for legalizing these substances. We have to approach this issue from a holistic perspective. It is a plain fact that the illegality of drugs has contributed to a considerable reduction in its consumption. The records are there for anyone familiar with statistical data in psychology.
It is a very plausible argument to push for legalizing marijuana & less harder substances, at least for small amounts & personal use. This is because as we have all seen, the consequences of the attempt at prohibiting these drugs is not worth the damage done by the substance.
But to use this as a basis for pushing for selling cocaine & other cracks off the shelve? That might be biting more than we can chew...even a closer look at the statement by former Mexican President Vicente Fox in the link posted above dwelled more on marijuana & the likes. He was a little conservative on calling out-rightly for the legalizing of cocaine!!! I'm sure any right thinking government will know better!!!
Finally, we have been talking about revenue and all, it is true that from a revenue perspective, countries can do a lot of good to their economy with these drug-generated billions, but please, spare Africa more revenue problems. The problem oil has caused to us, thanks to our leadership, has not been resolved. How much more legalizing drug-peddling and fueling corruption-infested leaders' ego to siphon more billions from drug racketeering...that's a recipe for disaster!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)